Integrated Executive Summary of Australia’s Submissions (World Trade Organization)
Australia
2016
Plain packaging of tobacco products: evidence, design, and implementation (World Health Organization)
International
2016
Full Judgment – British American Tobacco and others v Department of Health (High Court of Justice in England and Wales)
United Kingdom
2016
Summary of Judgment – British American Tobacco and others v Department of Health (High Court of Justice in England and Wales)
United Kingdom
2016
Standardized Packaging of Tobacco Products – Evidence Review (Hammond)
Ireland
2014
Standardised packaging of tobacco – Independent review (Chantler)
United Kingdom
2014
Plain Tobacco Packaging: A Systematic Review (PHRC)
Australia
2012
Market Research to Determine Effective Plain Packaging of Tobacco Products (Dept. of Health and Ageing)
Australia
2011
Market Research to Determine Effective Plain Packaging of Tobacco Products – Appendices (Dept. of Health and Ageing)
Australia
2011
Market Research to Determine Impact of Plain Packaging on Other Tobacco Products (Dept. of Health and Ageing)
Australia
2011
Tobacco companies launch legal action against plain packaging (BMJ – Sweet)
Australia
2011
Deadly in pink: The impact of cigarette packaging amount young women (Tob Control – Doxey & Hammond)
Canada
2011
Perception de l’efficacité des paquets de cigarettes standardisés. Une étude dans un contexte français. [Effectiveness perception of plain packaging of tobacco products: findings from France]. (BEH – Gallopal-Morvan et al.)
France
2011
Plain packaging increases visual attention to health warnings on cigarette packs in non-smokers and weekly smokers but not daily smokers (Addiction – Munafo et al.)
United Kingdom
2011
Young adult smokers’ perceptions of illicit tobacco and the possible impact of plain packaging on purchase behaviour (EJPH – Moodie et al.)
United Kingdom
2011
Estimating the impact of pictorial health warnings and plain cigarette packaging. Evidence from experimental auctions among adult smokers in the United States (Health Policy – Thrasher et al.)
United States
2011
Impact of female-oriented cigarette packaging in the US (NTR – Hammond et al.)
United States
2011
The impact of cigarette pack design, descriptors, and warning labels on risk perception in the U.S. (Am J Prev Med – Bansal-Travers et al.)
United States
2011
What do cigarette pack colors communicate to smokers in the US? (Am J Prev Med – Bansal-Travers et al.)
United States
2011
The case of plain packaging of cigarettes (EJR – Alemanno & Bonadio)
Australia
2010
Beliefs about the relative harm of light and low tar cigarettes (Tob Control – Elton-Marshal et al.)
China
2010
Malaysia and Thai smokers’ beliefs about the harmfulness of light and menthol cigarettes (Tob Control – King et al.)
Malaysia
2010
The alchemy of Marlboro: Transforming ‘light’ into ‘gold’ in Mexico (Tob Control – Thrasher et al.)
Mexico
2010
Effects of dissuasive packaging on young adult smokers (Tob Control – Hoek et al.)
New Zealand
2010
The Impact of Cigarette Package Design on Perceptions of Risk
Canada
2009
Cigarette pack design and perceptions of risk among UK adults and youth (EJPH – Hammond et al.)
United Kingdom
2009
The Case For the Plain Packaging of Tobacco Products (Addiction – Freeman et al.)
Australia
2008
How Does Increasingly Plainer Cigarette Packaging Influence Adult Smokers’ Perceptions About Brand Image? An Experimental Study (Tob Control – Wakefield, Germain, and Durkin)
Australia
2008
Colouring of cigarette packs in New Zealand, does it mislead customers – New Zealand (Government Report – Peace et al.)
New Zealand
2007
Implications of the Federal Court Order Banning the Terms Light and Mild What Difference Could It Make (Tobac Control – Anderson et al.)
United States
2007
Investigating the Impact of New “Light” and “Mild” Related Messages on Cigarette Packages (Government Report)
Canada
2005
What Smokers Believe about Light and Ultralight Cigarettes (Preventive Medicine – Etter et al.)
Switzerland
2003
Light Mild Cigarettes Who Smokes Them Are They Being Misled (Can Jour Pub Health – Ashley et al.)
Canada
2001
Beliefs about Light and Ultra Light cigarettes and efforts to change those beliefs.. (Tob Control – Kozlowski and Pillitteri)
United States
2001
Smokers’ Beliefs About Light and Ultra Light Cigarettes (Tob Control – Shiffman et al.)
United States
2001
Test of Light cigarette Counter-advertising Using a Standard Test of Advertising Effectiveness (Tob Control – Shiffman et al.)
United States
2001
Measuring Smokers’ Perceptions of the Health Risks From Smoking Light Cigarettes (Amer Jour of Public Health – Kozlowski et al.)
United States
2000
The Effect of Plain Packaging on Response to Health Warnings (Amer Jour of Publ Hlth – Goldberg et al.)
Canada
1999
The Case for Plain Packaging (Tob Control – Cunningham and Kyle)
Canada
1995
A Study on Youth Smoking – Plain Packaging, Health Warnings, Event Marketing and Price Reductions (Report – Rootman and Flay)
Canada
1995
The Effect of Plain Packages on the Perception of Cigarette Health Warnings (Society of Publ Hlth – Beede and Lawson)
New Zealand
1992