Research & Reports on Plain Packaging

Integrated Executive Summary of Australia’s Submissions (World Trade Organization)
Australia
2016

Plain packaging of tobacco products: evidence, design, and implementation (World Health Organization)
International
2016

Full Judgment – British American Tobacco and others v Department of Health (High Court of Justice in England and Wales)
United Kingdom
2016

Summary of Judgment – British American Tobacco and others v Department of Health (High Court of Justice in England and Wales)
United Kingdom
2016

Standardized Packaging of Tobacco Products – Evidence Review (Hammond)
Ireland
2014

Standardised packaging of tobacco – Independent review (Chantler)
United Kingdom
2014

Plain Tobacco Packaging: A Systematic Review (PHRC)
Australia
2012

Market Research to Determine Effective Plain Packaging of Tobacco Products (Dept. of Health and Ageing)
Australia
2011

Market Research to Determine Effective Plain Packaging of Tobacco Products – Appendices (Dept. of Health and Ageing)
Australia
2011

Market Research to Determine Impact of Plain Packaging on Other Tobacco Products (Dept. of Health and Ageing)
Australia
2011

Tobacco companies launch legal action against plain packaging (BMJ – Sweet)
Australia
2011

Deadly in pink: The impact of cigarette packaging amount young women (Tob Control – Doxey & Hammond)
Canada
2011

Perception de l’efficacité des paquets de cigarettes standardisés. Une étude dans un contexte français. [Effectiveness perception of plain packaging of tobacco products: findings from France]. (BEH – Gallopal-Morvan et al.)
France
2011

Plain packaging increases visual attention to health warnings on cigarette packs in non-smokers and weekly smokers but not daily smokers (Addiction – Munafo et al.)
United Kingdom
2011

Young adult smokers’ perceptions of illicit tobacco and the possible impact of plain packaging on purchase behaviour (EJPH – Moodie et al.)
United Kingdom
2011

Estimating the impact of pictorial health warnings and plain cigarette packaging. Evidence from experimental auctions among adult smokers in the United States (Health Policy – Thrasher et al.)
United States
2011

Impact of female-oriented cigarette packaging in the US (NTR – Hammond et al.)
United States
2011

The impact of cigarette pack design, descriptors, and warning labels on risk perception in the U.S. (Am J Prev Med – Bansal-Travers et al.)
United States
2011

What do cigarette pack colors communicate to smokers in the US? (Am J Prev Med – Bansal-Travers et al.)
United States
2011

The case of plain packaging of cigarettes (EJR – Alemanno & Bonadio)
Australia
2010

Beliefs about the relative harm of light and low tar cigarettes (Tob Control – Elton-Marshal et al.)
China
2010

Malaysia and Thai smokers’ beliefs about the harmfulness of light and menthol cigarettes (Tob Control – King et al.)
Malaysia
2010

The alchemy of Marlboro: Transforming ‘light’ into ‘gold’ in Mexico (Tob Control – Thrasher et al.)
Mexico
2010

Effects of dissuasive packaging on young adult smokers (Tob Control – Hoek et al.)
New Zealand
2010

The Impact of Cigarette Package Design on Perceptions of Risk
Canada
2009

Cigarette pack design and perceptions of risk among UK adults and youth (EJPH – Hammond et al.)
United Kingdom
2009

The Case For the Plain Packaging of Tobacco Products (Addiction – Freeman et al.)
Australia
2008

How Does Increasingly Plainer Cigarette Packaging Influence Adult Smokers’ Perceptions About Brand Image? An Experimental Study (Tob Control – Wakefield, Germain, and Durkin)
Australia
2008

Colouring of cigarette packs in New Zealand, does it mislead customers – New Zealand (Government Report – Peace et al.)
New Zealand
2007

Implications of the Federal Court Order Banning the Terms Light and Mild What Difference Could It Make (Tobac Control – Anderson et al.)
United States
2007

Investigating the Impact of New “Light” and “Mild” Related Messages on Cigarette Packages (Government Report)
Canada
2005

What Smokers Believe about Light and Ultralight Cigarettes (Preventive Medicine – Etter et al.)
Switzerland
2003

Light Mild Cigarettes Who Smokes Them Are They Being Misled (Can Jour Pub Health – Ashley et al.)
Canada
2001

Beliefs about Light and Ultra Light cigarettes and efforts to change those beliefs.. (Tob Control – Kozlowski and Pillitteri)
United States
2001

Smokers’ Beliefs About Light and Ultra Light Cigarettes (Tob Control – Shiffman et al.)
United States
2001

Test of Light cigarette Counter-advertising Using a Standard Test of Advertising Effectiveness (Tob Control – Shiffman et al.)
United States
2001

Measuring Smokers’ Perceptions of the Health Risks From Smoking Light Cigarettes (Amer Jour of Public Health – Kozlowski et al.)
United States
2000

The Effect of Plain Packaging on Response to Health Warnings (Amer Jour of Publ Hlth – Goldberg et al.)
Canada
1999

The Case for Plain Packaging (Tob Control – Cunningham and Kyle)
Canada
1995

A Study on Youth Smoking – Plain Packaging, Health Warnings, Event Marketing and Price Reductions (Report – Rootman and Flay)
Canada
1995

The Effect of Plain Packages on the Perception of Cigarette Health Warnings (Society of Publ Hlth – Beede and Lawson)
New Zealand
1992